experiment: single owner query

[aerooneqq]

Now five queries (local_def_id_to_hir_id, opt_hir_owner_nodes, hir_attr_map, opt_ast_lowering_delayed_lints, in_scope_traits_map) were replaced with regular methods which acts like getters, depending on the perf run maybe caches will be added for them.

r? @petrochenkov

[petrochenkov]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: a7e17f9 (a7e17f9dcdebc727f983dd75b86950023250e23a, parent: 92c7010294007f9bb819f0ddd9d9e9b5ccd5714a)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (a7e17f9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	42.5%	[0.3%, 107.3%]	7
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	27.3%	[0.0%, 106.5%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-2.6%, -0.2%]	111
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.6%	[-5.3%, -0.2%]	68
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.4%	[-2.6%, 107.3%]	118

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.5%, secondary -0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	17.4%	[9.5%, 28.4%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.6%	[2.3%, 7.3%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.2%	[-2.2%, -0.6%]	36
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.1%	[-6.8%, -1.8%]	14
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.5%	[-2.2%, 28.4%]	42

Cycles

Results (primary 40.1%, secondary 5.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	61.3%	[9.7%, 117.9%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	19.9%	[1.8%, 63.2%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-2.6%, -2.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.8%	[-5.3%, -1.5%]	16
All ❌✅ (primary)	40.1%	[-2.6%, 117.9%]	9

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 500.795s -> 487.693s (-2.62%)
Artifact size: 394.31 MiB -> 394.27 MiB (-0.01%)

[petrochenkov]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 7769c1a (7769c1a185b3989b2a2bf22894bf03f2b0505c4c, parent: cf79d034aa3d8f396d407aafce6f1ccd818e710e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (7769c1a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.6%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-1.7%, -0.2%]	99
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.0%	[-2.8%, -0.0%]	56
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-1.7%, -0.2%]	99

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary 2.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[1.0%, 3.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.9%	[2.3%, 7.4%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-0.9%, -0.6%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	[-2.3%, -1.5%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.9%, 3.5%]	8

Cycles

Results (primary -2.9%, secondary -0.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.5%	[1.3%, 6.8%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-3.5%, -1.3%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	11
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	11

Bootstrap: 493.065s -> 491.562s (-0.30%)
Artifact size: 394.27 MiB -> 394.23 MiB (-0.01%)

[rust-bors]

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #155460) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.