Skip to content

RDKEMW-17526: Disable GPU memory accounting for service workers#3914

Open
asurdej-comcast wants to merge 1 commit intosupport/8.4.4.0from
feature/RDKEMW-18183
Open

RDKEMW-17526: Disable GPU memory accounting for service workers#3914
asurdej-comcast wants to merge 1 commit intosupport/8.4.4.0from
feature/RDKEMW-18183

Conversation

@asurdej-comcast
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 7, 2026 07:59
@asurdej-comcast asurdej-comcast requested review from a team as code owners May 7, 2026 07:59
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the WPE WebKit 2.38.8 Yocto recipe to apply an additional downstream patch that prevents service worker web processes from performing GPU memory accounting, avoiding erroneous memory-pressure decisions caused by footprint underflow/overflow when video memory is attributed to a different process.

Changes:

  • Bump the recipe PR revision from r12 to r13.
  • Add and apply a new WPEWebKit patch that disables GPU memory accounting for service worker processes and hardens footprint calculation against video-memory > total-footprint scenarios.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
recipes-extended/wpe-webkit/wpe-webkit_2.38.8.bb Bumps recipe PR and adds the new patch to SRC_URI.
recipes-extended/wpe-webkit/files/2.38.8/1651_Disable_GPU_mem_check_for_service_workers.patch Introduces the WPEWebKit changes to disable GPU memory accounting for service workers and prevent footprint underflow.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants