Skip to content

docs: refresh README with repository capability review#56

Merged
rad1092 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/review-repository-and-update-readme
Feb 15, 2026
Merged

docs: refresh README with repository capability review#56
rad1092 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/review-repository-and-update-readme

Conversation

@rad1092
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@rad1092 rad1092 commented Feb 15, 2026

Motivation

  • Update the top-level documentation to reflect a repository-wide capability audit and to make the project entrypoint concise and actionable.
  • Provide a clear inventory of features (CLI, preprocessing, analysis, visualization, API/UI) and what types of analyses the codebase supports.
  • Clarify the project’s NLP maturity so users know which parts are rule-based versus LLM-enabled.

Description

  • Replace the existing long-form setup guide with a streamlined README.md titled BitNet Tools that summarizes purpose and quick-start steps.
  • Add a structured feature inventory covering CLI commands (analyze, report, multi-analyze, compare, doctor, ui, desktop), input preprocessing (csv, .xlsx, document), analysis core (summary stats, missing/value rules, geo checks), visualization/ recommendation, and API/UI surface.
  • Document supported analysis coverage (data quality, descriptive stats, multi-file aggregation, before/after comparison, geo validation, document/excel normalization) and add an explicit NLP capability assessment describing strengths and limits.
  • Surface input support constraints and a short test/status section with example commands and usage snippets for common flows.

Testing

  • Verified CLI help output with python -m bitnet_tools.cli --help, which returned usage info successfully.
  • Executed the full test suite with pytest -q, which completed successfully with 81 passed.

Codex Task

@rad1092 rad1092 merged commit 4d3e55c into main Feb 15, 2026
4 checks passed
@rad1092 rad1092 deleted the codex/review-repository-and-update-readme branch February 15, 2026 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant