Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Actions don't look good, I'll take another look. |
Contributor
Author
Contributor
|
You are freeing the atom before you use it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This leak was introduced in commit 4a66289 when the public
JS_NewSymbolAPI was first added. The function callsJS_NewAtomto create an atom from the description string, but never callsJS_FreeAtomafter passing it toJS_NewSymbolFromAtom. This results in the atom's reference count never reaching zero, leaking memory for every symbol created via this C API.