Skip to content

fix: address PR review comments on workflow files#135

Open
Harmanpreet-Microsoft wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:devfrom
Harmanpreet-Microsoft:psl-newworkflow
Open

fix: address PR review comments on workflow files#135
Harmanpreet-Microsoft wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:devfrom
Harmanpreet-Microsoft:psl-newworkflow

Conversation

@Harmanpreet-Microsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

  • azure-dev.yml: Export derived RG name as AZURE_RESOURCE_GROUP (not RESOURCE_GROUP) so azd provision picks up the correct resource group when vars.AZURE_RESOURCE_GROUP is empty.

  • azd-template-validation.yml: Use secrets.AZURE_PRINCIPAL_ID instead of secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID as fallback for AZURE_PRINCIPAL_ID. Client ID is not the SP object ID and causes RBAC assignment failures.

  • ...

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Golden Path Validation

  • I have tested the primary workflows (the "golden path") to ensure they function correctly without errors.

Deployment Validation

  • I have validated the deployment process successfully and all services are running as expected with this change.

What to Check

Verify that the following are valid

  • ...

Other Information

- azure-dev.yml: Export derived RG name as AZURE_RESOURCE_GROUP (not
  RESOURCE_GROUP) so azd provision picks up the correct resource group
  when vars.AZURE_RESOURCE_GROUP is empty.

- azd-template-validation.yml: Use secrets.AZURE_PRINCIPAL_ID instead of
  secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID as fallback for AZURE_PRINCIPAL_ID. Client ID
  is not the SP object ID and causes RBAC assignment failures.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant