Tier unsupported sites by scraping difficulty

[guergabo]

Summary

Restructures the Unsupported Websites section of the browsers FAQ into a tiered list (Very Hard / Hard) of sites that are difficult or infeasible to automate today, with a short description of what to expect at each tier.

Inspired by per-site difficulty resources elsewhere in the scraping community, but using our own observations rather than linking out.

Drops the earlier <Info> callout in bot-detection/overview.mdx.

Preview

https://tbd-6fc993ce-hypeship-scraperly-link.mintlify.app/browsers/faq#unsupported-websites

Test plan

• Mintlify preview renders the tiered list cleanly
• #unsupported-websites anchor still resolves

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
Kernel	🟢 Ready	View Preview	May 11, 2026, 5:22 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low.

The actual diff only adds a short informational <Info> callout with an external link in browsers/bot-detection/overview.mdx. There are no codepath, config, navigation, prompt, infrastructure, auth, permissions, or data changes, and I didn’t find a CODEOWNERS file in the repo.

The PR is already approved on the current head commit, so I’m leaving this assessment as a comment only and not re-approving.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low.

The actual diff only adds a short <Info> callout with an external Scraperly link in browsers/bot-detection/overview.mdx. There are no codepath, config, navigation, prompt/model-instruction, infrastructure, auth, permissions, or data changes, and I didn’t find a CODEOWNERS file in the repo.

The PR already has an approval recorded, so I’m leaving this assessment as a comment only and not re-approving.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Risk assessment: Very Low.

The current diff only updates copy in browsers/faq.mdx to categorize unsupported websites by scraping difficulty. There are no codepath, config, navigation, infrastructure, auth, permissions, data, or model-instruction changes, and I didn’t find a CODEOWNERS file in the repo.

The PR is already approved, so I’m leaving this assessment as a comment only and not re-approving.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}