Skip to content

Objective sensitivity for Conic and Quadratic#330

Merged
joaquimg merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
jg/objsensib
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

Objective sensitivity for Conic and Quadratic#330
joaquimg merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
jg/objsensib

Conversation

@joaquimg
Copy link
Member

@joaquimg joaquimg commented Dec 1, 2025

No description provided.

@joaquimg joaquimg requested a review from blegat February 16, 2026 00:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.47%. Comparing base (1b3cfe1) to head (325fe18).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #330      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.72%   89.47%   +0.74%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        1960     2023      +63     
==========================================
+ Hits         1739     1810      +71     
+ Misses        221      213       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andrewrosemberg
Copy link
Collaborator

andrewrosemberg commented Feb 17, 2026

LGTM, checked on a few local models, and objective sensitivity seems correct so far. Will test a few more and update this comment.

All local problems working :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@andrewrosemberg andrewrosemberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@joaquimg joaquimg merged commit ae803ef into master Feb 17, 2026
7 checks passed
@joaquimg joaquimg deleted the jg/objsensib branch February 17, 2026 03:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments