Merged
Conversation
This adds in the row-level link to access policies, supporting data sourcing and access control.
Contributor
|
Collaborator
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds in the row-level link to access policies, supporting data sourcing and access control.
This requires the addition of a new global id type, but that's important for the FHIR implementation already.
This relies on DUO concept expansion: We may want to enumerate at least the Data Use Permission portion as we have a "Registered Tier" that doesn't fit 1:1. We might want to pivot further though if we don't feel that axis aligns with our restrictions. EG, are the studies GRU or HMB "in spirit" even if it's open access?