Skip to content

Improve 11.0 P4 coverage#37160

Open
guardrex wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
guardrex/rel-11-prev4-updates
Open

Improve 11.0 P4 coverage#37160
guardrex wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
guardrex/rel-11-prev4-updates

Conversation

@guardrex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@guardrex guardrex commented May 15, 2026

Fixes #37156

Tom, Wade ... Just need one review to get this set of improvements in. I found some content that Copilot generated that I liked for improvements to the What's New coverage.

Ilona ... No need to review the whole thing, but a quick ❓🏃‍♀️ for ya ... When Copilot wrote that the .NET Web Worker (old name)/Blazor Web Worker (new name) project template is also for Blazor Web Apps, I assume that it meant for the .Client (CSR) side of a BWA. Is that correct? If so, I think I did a little better with phrasing than what Copilot produced by going with an opening line of ...

The standalone .NET Web Worker project template, which scaffolds a Web Worker client for offloading long-running work to a background thread in Blazor WebAssembly and Blazor Web apps (for client-side rendering, CSR), was renamed to the Blazor Web Worker project template (`blazorwebworker`) to make it clearer that it's part of the Blazor stack.

Does that look good to you, or would you like to change it?

Also ...... 🙈 ..... one more ❓... Dan and I are concerned about cross-linking PU issues/PRs due to developers bikeshedding comments ... commenting on closed issues/PRs. On this PR, I did what Copilot did for a number of the new features by adding the PU PR cross-link, which can be helpful to devs looking for more details. I do not do that in the article content tho, just in the What's New content. I place the remark, "(Please don't comment on closed issues and PRs)," on every link that I place. Do you think that's ok in this case? ... and indeed, Copilot did do that over in the .NET release note doc. If you think it's going to end in tears 😢 for the team with folks commenting on your closed issues/PRs, then I think I should remove these PU PR links here. Perhaps, Copilot should be instructed to stop doing it over there, too.


Internal previews

📄 File 🔗 Preview link
aspnetcore/blazor/tooling.md aspnetcore/blazor/tooling
aspnetcore/fundamentals/servers/yarp/distributed-tracing.md aspnetcore/fundamentals/servers/yarp/distributed-tracing
aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-11.md aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR improves ASP.NET Core 11 Preview 4 documentation coverage, primarily for Blazor release notes, and updates OpenTelemetry terminology in related docs.

Changes:

  • Expands Blazor 11.0 release note coverage for Web Worker, virtualization, Gateway, and WebAssembly trimming updates.
  • Updates OpenTelemetry naming/linking in YARP distributed tracing and Blazor tooling docs.
  • Refreshes the ASP.NET Core 11 release notes ms.date.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-11/includes/blazor.md Expands Blazor Preview 4 release note content and resource links.
aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-11.md Updates release notes metadata date.
aspnetcore/fundamentals/servers/yarp/distributed-tracing.md Updates OpenTelemetry terminology and links.
aspnetcore/blazor/tooling.md Updates OpenTelemetry/OTLP wording for the service defaults template.

Comment thread aspnetcore/fundamentals/servers/yarp/distributed-tracing.md
Comment thread aspnetcore/blazor/tooling.md
Comment thread aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-11/includes/blazor.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make further 11.0 Preview 4 Blazor content updates

2 participants