Skip to content

Conversation

@HashEngineering
Copy link
Contributor

@HashEngineering HashEngineering commented Feb 9, 2026

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated external dependency to the latest version.

@HashEngineering HashEngineering self-assigned this Feb 9, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the DashSharedCore dependency version from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2 in the DashSync.podspec file. This is a straightforward dependency version bump with no other code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Update
DashSync.podspec
Bumped DashSharedCore dependency from version 0.5.1 to 0.5.2.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A carrot of code, so shiny and new,
Version bumped up, from old one to true,
DashSharedCore climbs from point-five to more,
Dependencies updated, dependency store! 📦✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title mentions updating 'DashSyncCore' but the actual change is to 'DashSharedCore' dependency version, creating a mismatch between the stated and actual changes. Update the PR title to accurately reflect the change: 'chore: update DashSharedCore to 0.5.2 to support multisig outputs' or clarify the relationship between DashSyncCore and DashSharedCore.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/update-dashsharedcore-0.5.2

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant