Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency database_consistency to v3#1238

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intostagingfrom
renovate/database_consistency-3.x
Open

chore(deps): update dependency database_consistency to v3#1238
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intostagingfrom
renovate/database_consistency-3.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 2, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
database_consistency '~> 2.1.1''~> 3.0.1' age confidence

Release Notes

djezzzl/database_consistency (database_consistency)

v3.0.1

Compare Source

  • Improve grammar, spelling, and terminology in checker messages. Thanks julik for the contribution!

v3.0.0

Compare Source

  • Add MissingIndexFindByChecker to detect columns used in find_by calls that lack a database index. Uses Ruby's native Prism parser (Ruby 3.3+) to scan project source files. Requires no additional dependencies and silently skips on older Ruby versions.
  • Add ViewPrimaryKeyChecker to enforce setting primary_key for models pointing to database views.
  • Improve UniqueIndexChecker and MissingUniqueIndexChecker to support partial indexes and uniqueness validators with conditions option.
  • Fix UniqueIndexChecker to skip partial indexes (indexes with a WHERE clause).
  • Fix MissingUniqueIndexChecker to skip uniqueness validators with a conditions option.
  • Fix MissingDependentDestroyChecker to skip polymorphic associations. Thanks Andy Allan for reporting this!
  • Fix ForeignKeyCascadeChecker to handle missing primary key (no-primary-key tables) and support composite foreign/primary keys. Thanks Andy Allan for reporting this!

v2.1.3

Compare Source

  • Fix MissingDependentDestroyChecker to support composite keys. Thanks Andy Allan for reporting this!

v2.1.2

Compare Source

  • Fix ForeignKeyTypeChecker to support composite keys. Thanks Quentin de Metz for reporting this!
  • Fix MissingUniqueIndexChecker to support composite keys. Thanks Andy Allan for reporting this!

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Mar 2, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.59%. Comparing base (502d857) to head (7f23840).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #1238   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    77.59%   77.59%           
========================================
  Files           54       54           
  Lines         1406     1406           
========================================
  Hits          1091     1091           
  Misses         315      315           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/database_consistency-3.x branch from aeac751 to e9102a4 Compare March 7, 2026 13:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/database_consistency-3.x branch from e9102a4 to 7f23840 Compare March 13, 2026 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants