feat(custom-tier): centralize tier configs and add ability to have your own preset#162
Open
mkozal wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat(custom-tier): centralize tier configs and add ability to have your own preset#162mkozal wants to merge 1 commit into
mkozal wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Owner
|
Love the Idea, will make some slight modifications, but we're definitely willing to implement this idea. Thanks for taking the leadership on actually phasing out the code. One of the beauties of TrueMemory is it's more the architecture that "makes it great" on quality of retrieval, less the re-ranker and embeddings model. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey Josh,
As I was looking at the README what surprised me a little was that predefined tiering and I was wondering I could use something else instead? So instead of complaining/requesting this I checked out the code, asked Gemini to do some work and this is the result.
Let me know if this is welcome and if there are some implications I might be missing of using "unproven" setup.
Cheers