chore(deps): refresh LICENSE-binary for transitive version drift

[bobbai00]

What changes were proposed in this PR?

Refresh the per-module LICENSE-binary files so they match the bundled versions reported by the nightly drift check on b9bbf0d. Every entry stays in the license section it was already in, so the change is a pure version-string substitution; reviewers should still confirm each upstream's license at the new version is unchanged.

Drift covered:

• frontend/LICENSE-binary — lodash 4.17.23 → 4.18.1
• amber/LICENSE-binary-java and the 5 platform services (access-control-service, config-service, file-service, workflow-compiling-service, computing-unit-managing-service) — org.checkerframework.checker-qual 3.42.0 → 3.52.0
• amber/LICENSE-binary-python —
  • hf-xet 1.4.3 → 1.5.0
  • markdown-it-py 4.0.0 → 4.1.0
  • pydantic 2.13.3 → 2.13.4
  • pydantic-core 2.46.3 → 2.46.4

All bumps are transitive, which is why PR-mode runs (check_binary_deps.py --ignore-transitive-version) accepted them; only the nightly strict run flagged the drift.

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

Resolves #4974.

How was this PR tested?

• python3 bin/licensing/test_check_binary_deps.py — 27 tests pass.
• The check that originally flagged the drift (the nightly License Binary Checker workflow, which calls build.yml with mode: nightly and runs check_binary_deps.py without --ignore-transitive-version) is exercised by the build matrix on this PR; the previously-failing license steps for frontend, amber, the five platform services, and python are expected to turn green.

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.7, 1M context)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 42.71%. Comparing base (b9bbf0d) to head (516c083).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #4983   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     42.71%   42.71%           
  Complexity     2185     2185           
=========================================
  Files          1032     1032           
  Lines         38161    38161           
  Branches       4006     4006           
=========================================
  Hits          16301    16301           
  Misses        20840    20840           
  Partials       1020     1020           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
access-control-service	39.53% <ø> (ø)
agent-service	33.72% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from b9bbf0d
amber	43.18% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from b9bbf0d
computing-unit-managing-service	0.00% <ø> (ø)
config-service	0.00% <ø> (ø)
file-service	32.18% <ø> (ø)
frontend	33.09% <ø> (ø)
python	88.90% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from b9bbf0d
workflow-compiling-service	47.72% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.