Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] O(1) memory usage for IP generation#90

Merged
manupawickramasinghe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-generator-expr-2974958087072839460
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] O(1) memory usage for IP generation#90
manupawickramasinghe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-generator-expr-2974958087072839460

Conversation

@ManupaKDU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Replaced the list comprehension [...] used to create ips_to_scan with a generator expression (...) in testping1.py.
🎯 Why: To prevent an O(N) memory allocation spike. When scanning large subnets (like a /16 or /8), creating the entire list of IP objects upfront before passing them to the dictionary comprehension consumes significant memory unnecessarily.
📊 Impact: Reduces peak memory usage for intermediate storage from O(N) to O(1), as items are now yielded one-by-one into the dictionary comprehension.
🔬 Measurement: Use tracemalloc to compare memory peak before and after the change for a large total_ips value. Memory for the ips_to_scan variable assignment drops to near zero.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2974958087072839460 started by @ManupaKDU

Replaces list comprehension with generator expression when feeding
ThreadPoolExecutor, changing intermediate memory allocation from O(N) to O(1).

Co-authored-by: ManupaKDU <95234271+ManupaKDU@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@manupawickramasinghe manupawickramasinghe merged commit f4c7051 into main Jun 10, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants