Skip to content

docs: add Scope box (what it does / does not verify) for launch readiness#19

Merged
moonweave merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/scope-box
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

docs: add Scope box (what it does / does not verify) for launch readiness#19
moonweave merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/scope-box

Conversation

@moonweave

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why

Before a public "go use it" announcement, the README needs to set expectations. The tool errs toward flagging, so a new user testing real citations will see WARN/PARTIAL/UNVERIFIABLE often. Without framing, that reads as "broken / flags everything." This section reframes a non-ACCEPT verdict as "not auto-verifiable — check it yourself," not "the citation is wrong."

What

Adds a Scope section after What it catches with:

  • It verifies — DOI metadata + DOI-bound abstract claim support (quote-or-UNVERIFIABLE).
  • It does not verify (out of scope by design, not bugs) — full-text/figure/table values, relational/qualitative claims, abstract-withholding publishers, statistical metrics, paper quality/consensus.
  • Reading a verdict table — ACCEPT / WARN/PARTIAL / UNVERIFIABLE / REJECT and what each actually means.

Docs only. Pairs with the release bump (#18) and the false-PARTIAL fixes (#10/#16/#17) as the launch-readiness checklist.

moonweave and others added 3 commits June 8, 2026 22:44
Sets expectations before a public launch: ref-verify is a conservative guard,
not an oracle. Makes explicit that a non-ACCEPT verdict means "not
auto-verifiable, check it yourself" — not "the citation is wrong" — and lists
the out-of-scope cases (full-text/figure values, relational claims,
abstract-withholding publishers, statistical metrics) so a non-ACCEPT result on
a real claim does not read as the tool being broken. Adds a verdict-reading
table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@moonweave moonweave merged commit cdb639c into main Jun 8, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant