Update legacy sample pages #990
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace old links to uid2-web-integrations examples with new sample site links from samples.uidapi.com. Updated both sdk-ref-javascript.md and sdk-ref-javascript-v3.md to point to: - Client-Side JS SDK integration example - Client-Server JS SDK integration example - Reference to full Integration Samples and Tools page Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- Updated sample titles to include "SDK v4 for JavaScript" - Removed redundant link to Integration Samples and Tools page Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
The examples folder was removed from uid2-web-integrations repo. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines
-23
to
-24
| For an [example application](https://example-jssdk-integ.uidapi.com/), with associated documentation, see the [UID2 SDK Integration Example](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-web-integrations/tree/main/examples/js-sdk). | ||
|
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also removed in the v2 section (which only exist in UID2) which is a legacy version
genwhittTTD
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| - [Code and docs](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-web-integrations/tree/main/examples/google-secure-signals-integration/with_sdk_v3) | ||
| - Running site: [Client-Side UID2 SDK Integration Example](https://secure-signals-client-server-integ.uidapi.com/) | ||
| - The example of JavaScript client-side integration: [Code](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-web-integrations/tree/main/examples/cstg) and running site ([Client-Side Integration Example, UID2 JavaScript SDK](https://cstg-integ.uidapi.com/)). | ||
| - Client-Side Integration Using UID2 SDK v4 for JavaScript: |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does it actually use v4? Do we need to say the version? Just checking.
genwhittTTD
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| - Client-Side Integration Using UID2 SDK v4 for JavaScript: | ||
| - [Code](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-examples/tree/main/web-integrations/javascript-sdk/client-side) | ||
| - Running site: [Client-Side UID2 Integration Example](https://js-client-side.samples.uidapi.com/) | ||
| - Client-Server Integration Using UID2 SDK v4 for JavaScript: |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here. Not sure we need to say v4 but your call.
genwhittTTD
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| - The example of JavaScript client-side integration: [Code](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-web-integrations/tree/main/examples/cstg) and running site ([Client-Side Integration Example, UID2 JavaScript SDK](https://cstg-integ.uidapi.com/)). | ||
| - Client-Side Integration Using UID2 SDK v4 for JavaScript: | ||
| - [Code](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-examples/tree/main/web-integrations/javascript-sdk/client-side) | ||
| - Running site: [Client-Side UID2 Integration Example](https://js-client-side.samples.uidapi.com/) |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not the doc per se, but your linked site https://js-client-side.samples.integ.euid.eu/ itself has a broken link in it, to the integration guide. URL looks mostly OK... perhaps you're missing the protocol?
genwhittTTD
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| - Running site: [Client-Side UID2 Integration Example](https://js-client-side.samples.uidapi.com/) | ||
| - Client-Server Integration Using UID2 SDK v4 for JavaScript: | ||
| - [Code](https://github.com/IABTechLab/uid2-examples/tree/main/web-integrations/javascript-sdk/client-server) | ||
| - Running site: [Client-Server UID2 Integration Example](https://js-client-server.samples.uidapi.com/) |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Again: Your site https://js-client-server.samples.integ.euid.eu/ has two broken doc links. The link to the Git repo works.
genwhittTTD
requested changes
Feb 12, 2026
Collaborator
genwhittTTD
left a comment
genwhittTTD
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly great. Few comments, including WRT the linked sites. Not sure if they are still draft perhaps.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.