Skip to content

boundary sampling fixes#458

Open
ivajankovic wants to merge 58 commits intoGeomScale:developfrom
ivajankovic:feature/boundary_sampling_fixes
Open

boundary sampling fixes#458
ivajankovic wants to merge 58 commits intoGeomScale:developfrom
ivajankovic:feature/boundary_sampling_fixes

Conversation

@ivajankovic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scaling ratio should be fixed now, also in (billiard) shake and bake.cpp files added minESS for double checking the python binding.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vissarion vissarion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update your branch with upstream and merge conflicts to simplify the review process.

}



Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not needed


params.facet_prev = facet;
return {min_plus, facet};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not needed

NT* Av_data = Av.data();
NT* sum_nom_data = sum_nom.data();

for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i, ++Av_data, ++sum_nom_data)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was that not here before? What is changed in this PR?

This diagnostic assumes that P is a full-dimensional H-polytope.
The facet identification and survivor logic rely on the assumption
that each facet corresponds to a unique supporting hyperplane and that
removing one constraint locally produces a (dim-1)-dimensional facet.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not understand "removing one constraint locally produces a (dim-1)-dimensional facet" Could you please explain?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants