Skip to content

Document access conflict scope type for campaigns#111

Closed
c1-dev-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/gov-379
Closed

Document access conflict scope type for campaigns#111
c1-dev-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/gov-379

Conversation

@c1-dev-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@c1-dev-bot c1-dev-bot bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Summary

  • Added documentation for the new "By Access Conflicts" review type in campaign creation, allowing campaigns to be scoped by conflict monitors instead of entitlements
  • Updated the campaigns page (campaigns.mdx) to document the new Review type field in campaign setup for both single-instance campaigns and templates
  • Added tabbed instructions in Step 3 (Choose what to review) for both "By entitlements" and "By access conflicts" workflows
  • Added a cross-reference section in the access conflicts page (access-conflicts.mdx) linking to the campaign scope feature
  • Added a release notes entry for the feature

Files changed

  • product/admin/campaigns.mdx — Added Review type field to Step 1, added tabbed scope instructions in Step 3 for both single campaigns and templates
  • product/admin/access-conflicts.mdx — Added "Review access conflicts in a campaign" section with cross-reference
  • product/release-notes.mdx — Added release notes entry for the access conflict scope type feature

Automated PR Notice

This PR was automatically created by c1-dev-bot as a potential documentation update.

This documentation requires:

  • Human review for accuracy and completeness
  • Verification that it matches current product behavior
  • Approval from the appropriate team before merging

Add documentation for the new "By Access Conflicts" review type that
allows campaigns to be scoped by conflict monitors instead of entitlements.

- Update campaigns.mdx with Review type field and tabbed scope instructions
- Add campaign cross-reference to access-conflicts.mdx
- Add release notes entry for the feature
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Mar 2, 2026

@jessstarr-hub
Copy link

Closing — this was auto-generated against the release notes ticket (GOV-379) by mistake. The correct docs PR is #112 (linked to GOV-380).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant