Pull Request Dashboard

[github-actions]

Note

Open PRs are grouped by deterministic routing over per-thread LLM classifications. CI, conflicts, and activity age are computed deterministically and are shown as facts, not used as standalone routing reasons.

Waiting on maintainer (approved)

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Deprecate opentracing shim public API	ADITYA-CODE-SOURCE	❌	✅	2d
Update dependency org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-gradle-plugin to v2.3.21	app/renovate	❌	✅	58d

Waiting on approvers

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Update spotless packages to v8.5.0	app/renovate	❌	✅	?
Fix Groovy OpenTelemetrySdk builder loading	ADITYA-CODE-SOURCE	❌	✅	0d
Group renovate minor version updates in weekly	jack-berg	✅	✅	0d
OSGi support and tests for OTLP exporters	jack-berg	✅	✅	0d
Remove deprecated ExtendedAttributes and related code	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
Remove view file config mechanism	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
profiles: improve JFR export example	jhalliday	✅	✅	14d
Update prometheusServerVersion to v1.6.1	app/renovate	❌	✅	?
Move otlp utilities to otlp package	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
Move delta record/collect coordination from instrument to series level	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
Protect against index out of bounds exception	jack-berg	❌	✅	21d
Use setup-gradle w/ cache-provider: basic to use more permissive MIT …	jack-berg	✅	❌	38d
Add JSON pretty-print to logging-otlp exporters	lucacavenaghi97	✅	✅	63d
Add a ConfigProvider callback for runtime instrumentation option changes	jackshirazi	❌	❌	8d
Make StandardComponentId constructor public	brunobat	✅	❌	197d

Waiting on authors

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Commit declarative config schema pojos to git	jack-berg	❌	✅	0d
Merge colliding Prometheus label values	ADITYA-CODE-SOURCE	✅	✅	0d
Limit exemplar label characters to conform to Prometheus limits	anuq	✅	✅	5d
Make snakeyaml-engine and jackson-databind optional at runtime	zeitlinger	✅	❌	22d
Update dependency java to v26	trask	✅	✅	36d
Replace ArrayBlockingQueue with park/unpark for BatchSpanProcessor$Worker	Khepu	✅	✅	21d
[DO NOT MERGE] JFR API usage	jhalliday	❌	✅	42d
Limit prometheus exemplar labels	harshitrjpt	✅	❌	5d

Waiting on external

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Update junit-framework monorepo	app/renovate	❌	❌	7d
Update dependency java to v26	app/renovate	❌	✅	23d
Add fallback endpoint support for OTLP exporters	sridharsurvi1	❌	❌	29d

Diagnostics

PR #8409
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=None
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8408
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=3 reviewer=0 external=0 none=2 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKKVv -> none (The author is just redirecting review attention to the generated POJO files and saying the build file is not the important part to review; no follow-up action is explicitly requested in this thread.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKMLE -> none (The author is just clarifying why the suppressed boxed-primitive comparison is safe; there’s no explicit request for follow-up or change.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKN7v -> author (The latest comment is from the PR author and says they want to evaluate changing the Jackson constructor/field setup, so the next step is on the author to investigate or implement that change.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKPJM -> author (The author identified a follow-up change to investigate (`with*` methods should maybe be named `set*`), so the next step is on the author to implement or confirm that adjustment.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKPwd -> author (The author flagged the toString implementation as undesirable and said it should be investigated/changed, so the next action is on the PR author.)
route: author

PR #8407
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CMfQS -> reviewer (The reviewer requested an explanatory comment, and the author has already added it, so the thread is back in the reviewer’s court to confirm the change.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CMnfF -> none (The question was answered by the author with an explanation, and no further action or change was requested in the thread.)
route: approver

PR #8406
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8401
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author responded to the reviewer’s issues and says they were fixed/adjusted, so the thread is back in the reviewer’s court for re-checking.)
route: approver

PR #8395
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8394
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8377
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=7
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86Ab-gj -> external (The approver says to wait for the real 7.3.0 release before merging, so the thread is blocked on an upstream release outside this repo.)
route: external

PR #8373
facts: approved=True conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> none (Author addressed the reviewer’s request by reverting the Graal workaround and treating the remaining CI failure as a separate issue; no further action is needed in this thread.)
route: maintainer

PR #8364
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=2 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86BhQsA -> author (The approver requested a comment and a change to the test strategy to avoid extra allocation, so the PR author needs to update the code/tests.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86BhVsZ -> author (The approver identified a missing requirement and requested the PR account for normalization collisions from `resource`, `scope`, and `additionalAttributes`, so the author needs to update the implementation.)
llm: pr-conversation -> external (The author says the PR is parked pending #8346, so follow-up is blocked on an outside dependency before they can apply the requested changes.)
route: author

PR #8362
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=5
threads: author=2 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86A2FZf -> author (A reviewer/outsider raised a concrete code change suggestion—use `codePointCount` instead of `length`—so the author needs to update the implementation or respond to that feedback.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86A2G81 -> author (A reviewer/outsider asked whether the new unit tests could be converted to parameterized tests, which requests a code change from the PR author.)
route: author

PR #8349
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=14
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author is asking maintainers/spec owners to weigh in on spec changes and contradictions, so the next response is on the reviewer/maintainer side.)
route: approver

PR #8335
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=None
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8326
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author is explicitly asking the java approvers to take a look, so the next action is on reviewers/approvers.)
route: approver

PR #8313
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g858njQs -> none (The author’s comment is explanatory and does not request reviewer input or further code changes, so no follow-up is needed on this thread.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86AVPvC -> reviewer (The author explained the test change as a fix for the reviewer’s concern, so the thread is back with the reviewer to validate or resolve it.)
route: approver

PR #8294
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=21
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8270
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=22
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g857PtCt -> author (The reviewer asked to change the approach, and the author acknowledged they’ll keep it as a follow-up, so the next step is for the author to act.)
route: author

PR #8261
facts: approved=True conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=36
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g855XQ2Y -> none (The author asked an optional compatibility question, and the approver answered “Fine with me,” so no follow-up action is needed.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g855rwM4 -> author (An approver asked “What’s this?” about the changed test line, so the author needs to explain or adjust it.)
route: author

PR #8256
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=38
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The reviewer asked for the benefit/justification, and the author replied with reasoning and a supporting link, so the thread is back with the reviewer to react or continue the discussion.)
route: approver

PR #8240
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=21
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest comment is from the author saying they still need to figure out the benchmark issue and will spend time on it, so the next step is on the author.)
route: author

PR #8232
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=23
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> external (CI is blocked by missing GraalVM Java 26 support upstream, not by repo-local changes.)
route: external

PR #8197
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=29
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> external (The PR was explicitly held pending the spec discussion, and the author pointed to the external specification issue, so the next step depends on that outside repository.)
route: external

PR #8164
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=63
threads: author=0 reviewer=2 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85z-n0C -> reviewer (The approver is requesting input from the review/configuration approvers on the proposed config-name guardrail, so the next step is reviewer-side feedback rather than author action.)
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author said they are waiting for approver feedback before updating, so the next step is for a reviewer/approver to respond.)
route: approver

PR #8076
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=8
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85-kTBF -> none (The reviewer’s note was a non-blocking suggestion to add a TODO, and the author replied “added,” so no further follow-up is needed in this thread.)
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The latest comment is the author asking how an extension can call `setConfig`, so the thread is waiting on reviewer/maintainer guidance or an answer.)
route: approver

PR #7924
facts: approved=True conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=58
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: maintainer

PR #7763
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=197
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The reviewer asked for the rationale, and the author has already answered; the thread is now waiting on the reviewer to accept the explanation or continue the review.)
route: approver

PR #7741
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=42
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest reply is an outsider suggesting an external JFR bridge and explicitly asking the author to weigh in, so the author has the next action.)
route: author

PR #6791
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=5
threads: author=2 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85aSnGV -> author (The approver is asking for a specification source, so the author needs to जवाब/justify the change before review can proceed.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85aSnh9 -> author (The approver requested a new test, so the author needs to implement it before review can continue.)
llm: pr-conversation -> none (The only comment is an informational FYI linking a duplicate PR, with no requested change or reply needed in this thread.)
route: author

Generated 2026-05-15 05:25 UTC